A
few days back, I was watching a live
debate between the British Prime Minister
Tony Blair and a number of British women
about the recent international
developments, particularly about the war
against Iraq, for which the USA and UK
Administrations are massing their troops.
It was obvious that the
women facing Blair had different
backgrounds: a businesswoman, a
housewife, a mother, a wife…The type of
questions asked, the courageous
selection of the subjects, the direct
accusations as well as the fluency and
forthrightness on the part of the ladies
were really admirable.
It was a serious and
constructive debate, not superficial, as
we are used to in many of the so-called
Arab “debates”. Although I do not intend
to generalize, one could easily say that a
good number of such debates are
pre-arranged with the “relative
authorities” and in full coordination with
the concerned parties.
The women expressed their
worries and pain, their absolute rejection
of war and their readiness to stop it even
with their bodies. And as an oriental Arab
and Moslem, the exchange of words between
Blair and the women astonished me. I
really admired the presenter, McDowell who
was fully biased to the ladies anti-war
camp. He controlled the show properly,
kept it far from the formalities and
baseless statements, which characterize
similar debates in our Arab World…
One of participants told the
British Prime Minister: “They say that you
are so obedient and soft, like a poodle,
to George Bush.”
Another lady said clearly
that she would not give her vote to Blair
again, because he breached the principles
that made her elect him before. And yet a
third one said she was ready to volunteer
as a human shield in face of the armies
that would invade Iraq.
But the most eloquent was
the one who said that her son was killed
in September 11 2001 in New York, but
still she can’t accept this war that Blair
and Bush are trying to wage against the
Muslims and Iraq.
One of the ladies present
accused Blair of being a racist. She said
that not Blair, nor any other person in
power has the right to involve UK in a war
for the sake of others; because
politicians go, but nations remain.
These are excerpts of the
debate, which truly represents the British
public opinion that stands against the
war.
I admit that my respect for
these brave people doubled and my
admiration for the great democracy that
prevails in England increased. But I have
also to admit that I was overwhelmed with
disappointment when I remembered the
situation of democracy in the Arab World.
When I compared the indifferent and bitter
Arab status to that debate, I felt
engulfed by frustration.
While European women were defending us and
were volunteering to travel to Iraq as
human shields to prevent the slaughter of
Iraqi children, our people were in deep
slumber.
That debate and the anti-war
demonstrations worldwide have convinced me
that democracy was buried without ceremony
in our Arab World and that the freedom of
thought has been assassinated several
centuries back.
The great British democracy
and the courage of the British people
could clearly be felt now in London.
The Minister of Environment
resigned, while other threatened to do so.
A number of the Labour Party
representatives in the House of Commons
resigned from the Party. Blair himself is
now standing in a narrow corner, facing
the danger of the collapse of his
government.
Amid all that, Blair
receives slap after slap, but still he
does not react like some Arab
dictatorships that refuse to speak the
truth to their peoples…
We do not know any more how
to communicate with our governments and
leaders because they created a bottomless
gap between them and their citizens.
Is there still a chance that
we take the proper lane and embrace
democracy?
|