A controversial book written in Hebrew by a historian who
teaches at Tel Aviv University has rocked Israel’s foundations
as a state for the Jewish people. “When and How Were the Jewish
People Invented?” by Professor Shlomo Sand has been a bestseller
for months and is set to be translated into numerous languages
with its launch in the US scheduled for later this year. Praised
by some and vilified by others, it has certainly opened up
intellectual debate and touched many nerves.
“When and How Were the Jewish People Invented?” attacks the
roots of Zionist ideology, which holds to the core belief that
Jews are not only adherents to a religion and members of a
cultural group but also a displaced people with a common
biological-genetic bloodline.
In his book, Professor Sand argues that Jews do not share a
genetic bloodline while their so-called historical existence as
a cohesive “nation-race” is mere myth. Instead, he postulates
that the idea of a refugee Jewish people forcibly strewn around
the Diaspora was cooked up by Zionist academics during the 19th
century as a fictional pretext for the establishment of a Jewish
state.
Sand believes that Jews are made up of ethnically diverse groups
sharing religious beliefs. The ancestors of most converted
during a period when Judaism encouraged its followers to
proselytise, he maintains. He says there was no famous enforced
exile from the Holy Land, which has naturally upset religious
Jews. A Jewish people never existed, he says, only a Jewish
religion. Moreover, those Jews originating from present-day
Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories have a greater
genetic connection with Palestinians than with other Jews, he
says. So how did Jews come to be scattered all over the planet?
Tom Segev, who reviewed Sand’s work in the Israeli
English-language daily Ha’aretz, answers this in his summary of
Sand’s explosive thesis:
“Sand quotes from many existing studies, some of which were
written in Israel but shunted out of the central discourse. He
also describes at length the Jewish Kingdom of Himyar in the
southern Arabian Peninsula and the Jewish Berbers in North
Africa. The community of Jews in Spain sprang from Arabs who
became Jews and arrived with the forces that captured Spain from
the Christians land from European-born individuals who had also
become Jews”.
“The first Jews of Ashkenaz (Germany) did not come from the Land
of Israel and did not reach Eastern Europe from Germany, but
became Jews in the Khazar Kingdom in the Caucasus. Sand explains
the origins of Yiddish culture: it was not a Jewish import from
Germany, but the result of the connection between the offspring
of the Kuzari and Germans who traveled to the East; some of them
as merchants. We find, then, that the members of a variety of
peoples and races, blond and black, brown and yellow, became
Jews in large numbers.”
The book undercuts the basis on which the Jewish state was built
because while there are precedents for a people’s right to their
own nation, there is little precedent for the establishment of a
state exclusively reserved for any one religious group.
Indeed, as Tom Segev points out the book “is intended to promote
the idea that Israel should be a ‘state of all its citizens’ –
Jews, Arabs and others – in contrast to its declared identity as
a ‘Jewish and Democratic state’.” This adds grist to the mill of
those now calling for a one-state solution.
Arguably if such a book had been published anywhere else in the
world – or penned by anybody other than a respected Israeli
Jewish historian – it would have been broadly labeled as
anti-Semitic. Professor Sand, however, has impeccable
credentials and is, therefore, not an easy target.
Born in Austria to Polish Jewish Holocaust survivors, Sand spent
his formative years in a camp for displaced persons before
immigrating with his family to the fledgling Israeli state in
1948. Like most Israelis, he completed his military service and
in 1975 graduated from Tel Aviv University with a BA in history.
The next 10 years were spent in Paris working towards an MA in
French history and a PhD.
Despite his personal and academic resume, Sand’s critics are
undeterred. His work has variously been described as a “final
solution to the Jewish problem” and “another manifestation of
mental disorder in the extreme academic left in Israel”.
Professor Israel Bartal, Dean of the Humanities Faculty of the
Hebrew University, has taken aspects of the book to task and
questions the author’s motives but he does admit this: “No
‘nationalist’ Jewish historian has ever tried to conceal the
well-known fact that conversions to Judaism had a major impact
on Jewish history in the ancient period and during the early
Middle Ages. Although the myth of an exile from the Jewish
homeland (Palestine) does exist in popular Israeli culture, it
is negligible in serious Jewish historical discussions”.
So there you have it! No doubt the discussion will continue for
a long time to come and once the book is published in other
languages non-Hebrew speakers will finally be able to join in.
|